Your AI writes code fast.
Attackers move faster.
Your CI passes. Your pentest won't.
Manual testing from the outside. Human-verified findings. Actionable before your next release.
Built for teams shipping fast on AI-generated code.
AI Writes Confident Code. That's the Problem.
Copilot, Cursor, and ChatGPT produce code that passes every test. These are 3 patterns they consistently get wrong.
of developers now use AI to write production code
GitHub, 2024
of AI-generated code contains security vulnerabilities
Stanford University, 2023
RS256→HS256 downgrade — token forgery
This JWT validator is secure. It properly verifies the token signature and extracts user claims before granting access.
// AI-generated JWT verification
const jwt = require('jsonwebtoken');
const publicKey = fs.readFileSync('./keys/rsa.pub');
app.use('/api', (req, res, next) => {
const token = req.headers.authorization?.split(' ')[1];
const decoded = jwt.verify(token, publicKey);
req.user = decoded;
next();
});
// Attacker sets header: {"alg":"HS256","typ":"JWT"}
// Signs with the public key as HMAC secret
// → Library treats RSA public key as HMAC key
// → Forged token passes verificationWe find patterns like these in most AI-heavy codebases we test.
The Asymmetry Problem
One attacker with autonomous tooling scans thousands of targets a day. Your team handles one sprint at a time.
Exploited CVE Growth
CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog
368 → 1507
+310%
Initial Access Vectors
Verizon 2025 DBIR — breach entry distribution
Breach Cost Trend
$3.92M → $4.88M
IBM Cost of a Data Breach — +24% over 6 years
FBI IC3 reported annual losses
Breaches involving weak or stolen credentials
Average Breach Detection
194 days
Mandiant M-Trends — global median dwell time
Scope to Report in Days
You define the target. We handle the rest.
Define Target
Tell us what to test — your domain, your priorities, your constraints.
Verify Ownership
Add a DNS record to prove ownership. No testing starts without it.
Testing
Our team tests from the outside — the same perspective an attacker has.
Get Report
Prioritized findings with evidence, business context, and fix guidance.
Define Target
Tell us what to test — your domain, your priorities, your constraints.
Verify Ownership
Add a DNS record to prove ownership. No testing starts without it.
Testing
Our team tests from the outside — the same perspective an attacker has.
Get Report
Prioritized findings with evidence, business context, and fix guidance.
Swipe to explore
Full Trust and Safety Rules
Show details
Engagement rules
- Verified ownership required before testing
- No credential handover required for baseline
- Non-destructive baseline by default
- Written approval for higher-impact actions
- Audit trail for approvals and transitions
Baseline includes
- Authentication, session, and access control
- API authorization and tenant boundary checks
- Common exploit chains (IDOR, SSRF, upload abuse)
- Rate limits and abuse paths
Not included unless approved
- Destructive load testing
- Data exfiltration beyond proof
- Any action outside approved scope boundaries
Pick Your Test
One-time assessment or ongoing validation. Both start the same way.
Black-Box Assessment
One-timeOne complete test of your external attack surface.
External black-box testing
Prioritized findings with evidence
Remediation guidance per finding
Test + Retest Program
ProgramAssessment now, verification retest after you fix. Confirms nothing regressed.
Everything in Black-Box Assessment
Follow-up retest window
Drift comparison report
What Changes After a Test
The same application, before and after a WeHackU engagement.
Before
Risk Score
8.4/10
194 days average detection
6 critical attack paths open
No prioritized fix path
What You Actually Get
This is a sanitized version of a real WeHackU report. Click through every tab.
Interactive sample
Click through the report.
Risk posture
Critical risk14
Findings
Severity distribution
Critical
2
High
4
Medium
5
Low
3
Executive summary
2 critical findings enable full account takeover and cross-tenant data access. Combined with 4 high-severity issues, the application is at material risk of breach. Immediate remediation recommended before next release.
Analyst validation
Exploitability confirmed with evidence
Business impact mapped per finding
False positives removed and collapsed
Scope guardrails logged and verified
Reproduction steps documented
Retest verification included
Common Questions
Straight answers about scope, process, and what to expect.
Process & Scope
Delivery & Results
Your next deploy ships in days. So does your security report.
Define your target, verify ownership, and we'll start testing.
No credentials. No agents. No access to your infrastructure.