Your AI writes code fast.
Attackers move faster.
|
Security testing from the outside in. Every finding includes evidence, a CVSS score, and a clear fix path.
Purpose-built for teams shipping AI-generated code.
0 days
median breach detection
IBM 2024
0 days
to your WeHackU report
Typical
0%
of AI code has vulnerabilities
Stanford 2024
AI Writes Confident Code. That's the Problem.
AI code compiles, tests pass, and it ships. These are real vulnerability classes that come out of AI-assisted development — and that attackers are already targeting.
Auth check present — object ownership missing
This GraphQL API is properly secured. All resolvers validate authentication, and the middleware ensures only logged-in users can access data.
// AI-generated GraphQL resolvers — auth added, ownership skipped
const resolvers = {
Query: {
user: async (_, { id }, ctx) => {
if (!ctx.user) throw new AuthError('Unauthenticated');
// ← auth check exists, but no ownership validation
return db.user.findById(id);
},
invoices: async (_, { userId }, ctx) => {
if (!ctx.user) throw new AuthError('Unauthenticated');
return db.invoices.findByUser(userId);
},
},
};
// Attacker introspects → finds all types, mutations, admin ops
// query { user(id:"admin-001") { email role apiKey passwordHash } }
// → 200 OK full admin profile returned to any logged-in userThese are real vulnerability classes — the kind that pass code review and break in production.
From the Teams We've Worked With
What teams say after their first engagement.
Our scanner produced 400 alerts a month. WeHackU gave us 14 actual findings with full exploit chains. Night and day.
noise → signal
400 alerts→14 real findings
Lead Engineer
Series B SaaS
We shipped a Copilot-assisted auth overhaul. WeHackU found the JWT algorithm confusion our entire team missed. It was critical in production.
AI code ≠ safe code
47 passing tests→auth bypass caught
CTO
Developer Tools
Report was in our hands 6 days after scope submission. Every finding had a reproduction step and a fix recommendation. Exactly what we needed for our SOC 2 audit.
audit-ready evidence
SOC 2 gap→6 days to report
Head of Security
FinTech
Scope to Report in Days
You define the target. We handle the rest.
Step 1 of 4
Define Target
Tell us what to test — your domain, your priorities, your constraints.
Full Trust and Safety Rules
Show details
Engagement rules
- Verified ownership required before testing
- No credential handover required for baseline
- Non-destructive baseline by default
- Written approval for higher-impact actions
- Audit trail for approvals and transitions
Baseline includes
- Authentication, session, and access control
- API authorization and tenant boundary checks
- Common exploit chains (IDOR, SSRF, upload abuse)
- Rate limits and abuse paths
Not included unless approved
- Destructive load testing
- Data exfiltration beyond proof
- Any action outside approved scope boundaries
What You Actually Get
A real WeHackU report, sanitized. Every finding includes evidence, a CVSS score, business context, and a clear remediation path.
Interactive sample
Click through the report.
Risk posture
Critical risk14
Findings
Severity distribution
Critical
2
High
4
Medium
5
Low
3
Executive summary
2 critical findings enable full account takeover and cross-tenant data access. Combined with 4 high-severity issues — session fixation, GraphQL schema exposure, admin bypass, and 2FA bypass — the application carries material breach risk. Immediate remediation required before next release.
Analyst validation
Exploitability confirmed with evidence
Business impact mapped per finding
False positives removed and collapsed
Scope guardrails logged and verified
Reproduction steps documented
Retest verification included
Choose Your Assessment
One-time assessment or ongoing validation. Both start the same way.
Black-Box Assessment
One-timeOne complete test of your external attack surface.
External black-box testing
Prioritized findings with evidence
Remediation guidance per finding
Test + Retest Program
ProgramAssessment now, verification retest after you fix. Confirms nothing regressed.
Everything in Black-Box Assessment
Follow-up retest window
Drift comparison report
WeHackU vs. The Alternatives
Security buyers run comparisons. Here's an honest one.
WeHackUAnalyst-led | Auto ScannerCVE-only | In-HouseYour team | Bug BountyCrowdsourced | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business logic flaws | Yes | No | Partial | Partial |
| Exploit chain analysis | Yes | No | Partial | No |
| Report in 7 days | Yes | Instant* | Weeks | Unknown |
| CVSS-scored findings | Yes | No | Partial | No |
| No credentials required | Yes | Yes | No | No |
| Business context per finding | Yes | No | Partial | No |
| Fixed scope & timeline | Yes | Yes | No | No |
* Automated scanners return instant results but match known CVE signatures only — exploitability unconfirmed.
Common Questions
Straight answers about scope, process, and what to expect.
No. We test entirely from the outside — no credentials, no VPN, no agent installed. Exactly the access an attacker has. You verify domain ownership by placing a token at a URL on your domain, then we start.
Start in minutes
Your next deploy ships in days.
So does your security report.
Set a target. Prove ownership. We start testing within 48 hours.
No setup. No access handover. Scope confirmed before any testing begins.
Findings so far
Weekly Security Brief
The security news worth reading.
CVEs, attack techniques, and patch radar — curated weekly from across the security landscape. No fluff, no vendor noise.
No account needed · Unsubscribe any time